Skip to content
SocialSportHub
Coaching concept

Feedback and Cueing

Feedback from your senses, a coach, or video plus short instructional cues guide skill learning — including internal vs external focus of attention.

Coaching concept

Overview

Feedback is the information a performer receives about a movement and its result. Some of it is intrinsic — the sensations that arise naturally from doing the action, such as what a swing feels like, where the limbs sit in space, and what the eyes and ears pick up. The rest is augmented, meaning it is added by an outside source: a coach's comment, a video replay, a mirror, a training partner, or a measurement. Augmented feedback is often split into knowledge of results, which describes the outcome such as whether the ball reached the target, and knowledge of performance, which describes the quality or form of the movement itself. Both kinds let a learner compare what they actually did with what they intended and adjust the next attempt.

A cue is a short instructional prompt that directs attention to one key feature of a movement. Because attention and working memory are limited, brief cues of only a few words tend to be more useful than long explanations, and giving one cue at a time is generally more effective than a list of corrections. Cues also shape the focus of attention. An internal focus points attention at the body itself ("bend the elbow", "squeeze the shoulder blades"), while an external focus points it at the effect of the movement on the environment, an implement, or a target ("push the floor away", "send the ball through the gap"). A widely reported general idea in coaching is that an external focus tends to produce more automatic, efficient movement and better retention, though some explicit guidance can help when a skill is entirely new. How feedback is delivered matters too: constant feedback can speed early performance but breed dependence, so it is commonly faded, summarised across several attempts, or delayed so the learner first tries to sense and correct their own error.

In practice

  • Two sources of feedback: intrinsic feedback comes from the performer's own senses — sight, sound, and the feel of the movement — while augmented feedback is added from outside by a coach, a video, a mirror, a partner, or a measurement.
  • Outcome versus form: knowledge of results describes what happened (did the shot go in), while knowledge of performance describes how the movement was made; both let the learner compare intention with reality and adjust the next try.
  • Keep cues short and singular: a few well-chosen words aimed at one key feature usually work better than long instructions, because attention and working memory can only hold so much at once.
  • Focus of attention: an internal focus attends to the body ("snap the wrist"), while an external focus attends to the movement's effect on a target or implement ("aim through the ball") — the external focus is widely reported to encourage more automatic, effective movement.
  • How often, not just what: frequent feedback can lift performance in the moment but create dependence, so it is often faded, summarised, or delayed to let the learner sense and correct their own errors, which tends to support longer-term learning.

A note on this information

This is general, educational information about how skill is learned in sport — not personalised coaching, medical advice or a training prescription. Everyone learns differently; a qualified coach can tailor these ideas to you.

What it applies to

Feedback and Cueing shapes how you develop these across the platform.

Explore across the knowledge base

Follow the threads that connect Feedback and Cueing to the rest of SocialSportHub.

Skills

Motivations

Sports science

Sports communication

Practice & sessions

Movement patterns